<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Microsoft Confidential &#187; Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/tag/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com</link>
	<description>News, views and reviews on Microsoft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Vista Capable case chuggs along</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/05/the-vista-capable-case-chuggs-along/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/05/the-vista-capable-case-chuggs-along/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FanBoy1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/05/the-vista-capable-case-chuggs-along/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time with Steve Ballmer attempting to evade being deposed in the class action &#8216;Windows Vista Capable&#8217; case. Joe Tartakoff has the details of what Steve&#8217;s lawyers are saying: Basically that he doesn&#8217;t know much. Just blame it on Jim Alchin we say. Oh hang on, that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re doing. The Vista Capable case is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time with Steve Ballmer attempting to evade being deposed in the class action &#8216;Windows Vista Capable&#8217; case. <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/bio.asp#bio124890">Joe Tartakoff</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/150502.asp?source=rss">has the details</a> of what Steve&#8217;s lawyers are saying: Basically that he doesn&#8217;t know much. </p>
<p>Just blame it on Jim Alchin we say. Oh hang on, that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/image19.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 5px 0px 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="Windows Vista Capable my ass!" border="0" alt="Windows Vista Capable my ass!" align="left" src="http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/image-thumb16.png" width="84" height="125" /></a> The Vista Capable case is a whole bunch of people complaining that the &#8216;Windows Vista Capable&#8217; stickers that got stuck on piss-poor performing PCs were misleading, and that Microsoft was aware of the fact but pushed it along anyway.</p>
<p>Our view on it is this: if Microsoft did knowingly promote Vista on boxes that couldn&#8217;t really handle it, then they&#8217;re fucking idiots. Why make your operating system look shit? Surely you&#8217;d want to only have it running on grunty machines that made it look slick and superfast. If they didn&#8217;t knowingly promote it then they should have at least made a point of stopping it. We think they fucked up which ever way you look at it.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Oh, and in terms of keeping all the plaintiffs up to date on proceedings, Microsoft <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/150380.asp?source=rss">plans to contact them via Windows Updates</a>. ROLF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/05/the-vista-capable-case-chuggs-along/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft extends XP downgrade rights. So what?</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/04/microsoft-extends-xp-downgrade-rights-so-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/04/microsoft-extends-xp-downgrade-rights-so-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FanBoy1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary-Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/04/microsoft-extends-xp-downgrade-rights-so-what/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Mary-Jo, we were interested to see that Microsoft is extending its downgrade rights to XP by another 6 months as reported by The Register. Unlike Mary-Jo, we don&#8217;t think this is confusing at all (to Vista, XP or any other users). Basically, Microsoft listened to its customer base and responded to feedback. There&#8217;s no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1619">Mary-Jo</a>, we were interested to see that Microsoft is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/03/windows_xp_recovery/">extending its downgrade rights to XP by another 6 months</a> as reported by The Register.</p>
<p>Unlike Mary-Jo, we don&#8217;t think this is confusing at all (to Vista, XP or any other users).</p>
<p>Basically, Microsoft listened to its customer base and responded to feedback. There&#8217;s no reason to think this suggests Vista isn&#8217;t ready for prime time (as Mary-Jo <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1619">alludes to</a>) &#8211; rather it&#8217;s just that Vista isn&#8217;t appropriate for some customers at this point in time. Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/04/microsoft-extends-xp-downgrade-rights-so-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

