<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Microsoft Confidential &#187; TCO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/tag/tco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com</link>
	<description>News, views and reviews on Microsoft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows TCO = Linux TCO</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/09/28/windows-tco-linux-tco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/09/28/windows-tco-linux-tco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FanBoy1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/09/28/windows-tco-linux-tco/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Company sponsored studies are by their very nature completely unreliable. It&#8217;s like trusting the medical advice the tobacco companies spun in the 70s. So, take this latest &#8216;analysis&#8216; with a grain of salt. In it Microsoft finds that (amazingly!) it aint cheaper to use Linux than it is to use Microsoft (at least over a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Company sponsored studies are by their very nature completely unreliable. It&#8217;s like trusting the medical advice the tobacco companies spun in the 70s.</p>
<p>So, take this latest &#8216;<a target="_blank" href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/0/a/20ac945c-34d0-4a60-8245-f80e80fe954f/Vital_Wave_Consulting_Affordable_Computing_TCO11June08.pdf">analysis</a>&#8216; with a grain of salt. In it Microsoft finds that (amazingly!) it aint cheaper to use Linux than it is to use Microsoft (at least over a 5 year time span). Skills shortage is the main reason attributed (p7) with Linux professionals earning 12.5% more than equivalently experienced Microsoft professionals. Mary-Jo has the <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1606">rundown</a>.</p>
<p>Of course the numbers only apply to large deployments, so don&#8217;t go thinking it impacts any home consumer environment.</p>
<p>When it comes to deploying large numbers of computers to emerging markets (ie poor countries who desperately need to be given access to the right tools for internet-izing their people) why you&#8217;d want to go for Linux anyway is beyond us, surely you&#8217;d want an operating system that has all the cool Aero graphic capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/09/28/windows-tco-linux-tco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

